3.3. Qualitative Analysis of User Opinion Data

the next set of questions shed light on how these difficulties affect everyday travel behavior for this population.   This section examines subjects’ responses to a series of open-ended question used to elicit information that can add to the results obtained from the previous, more structured, questions and the field experiment.
 
3.3.1. General Transportation Problems During the pre-test interview, before subjects had used the RIAS system, they were asked questions about problems that occurred when using transportation and then, more explicitly, when making transfers.   Subjects were asked to “List any transportation problems that restrict your choices for employment or job search” (f or all subjects’ comments, see APPENDIX 10 : Transit Problems That Restrict Employment ).  

3.3.1.1. Sample of Comments

3.3.1.2. Categorization of Responses

Subjects’ responses were broken down by individual statements and parsed to yield a list of single responses.   These responses were sorted alphabetically and naturally occurring categories, those with many similar or identical responses, were identified (for category analysis, see APPENDIX 11 : Categorization of Transportation Problems ).
Table 3. 2   Transit Problems That Restrict Employment
“List any transportation problems that restrict your choices for employment or job search”

 
Category 25 subjects
Limited service 29
Excess time 11
Lack of information 8
Transfer problems 5
Safety 2
Misc. 5

 
Only 25 subjects answered the question, with the other five subjects indicating they had no problems with transportation that affected their employment opportunities By far the most common problem indicated was “limited service,” with 29 responses.   This category included comments about limited service areas, frequency of vehicles, limited hours (especially on weekends and late at night), work destinations having to be close to transit, and that it was hard to travel long distances because various transit agencies and routes are not connected.

Excessive travel times were mentioned 11 times.   This category included comments about slow travel times, long waits, and other time constraints.   Lack of information was mentioned eight times.   These included comments about drivers not announcing stops, finding buses and bus stops, and, in general, a lack of personal spatial orientation and other identifying information.

Transfer problems were mentioned five times.   This category included comments about problems while making transfers and the uncertainty and difficulty inherent in transfer tasks.  Comments about safety were made twice.   One subject mentioned unsafe street crossing, and another mentioned having had an accident.

There were five comments that did not fall easily into any category.   Two people mentioned “expensive cab rides,” and another mentioned “poor driver attitudes.”   Two more general statements were “transit is a disadvantage” and “not reliable.”

There was evidence of an order effect for this question.   It was asked before any other discussion of transit difficulties for blind people.  The comments were about limited hours and service and inconvenience.   Few comments were made that would not also be made by the general transit-dependent population.   For this question, subjects did not mention problems caused by their lack of vision, but dealt with problems of a fixed route transit system.   Later on, as the questions got more specific, they opened up and talked about problems caused by lack of vision.
 

3.3.2. Problems with Transit Mode Transfers

During the pre-test interview, questions were asked about problems when making transfers between transit modes.   Subjects were asked, “Are there any specific problems with transferring between different transit modes which restrict your choice of employment or job search?” (for all subjects’ comments, see APPENDIX 12 : Transfer Problems That Restrict Employment ).

3.3.2.1. Sample of Comments

3.3.2.2. Categorization of Responses

Subjects’ responses were broken down by individual statements and parsed to yield a list of single responses.   These responses were sorted alphabetically, and naturally occurring categories, those with many similar or identical responses, were identified (for category analysis, see APPENDIX 13 : Categorization of Transfer Problems ).
 
Table 3. 3 Transfer Problems That Restrict Employment

“Are there any specific problems with transferring between different transit modes that restrict your choice of employment or job search?”
 
Category 23 subjects
Problems with identity or spatial information 56
System problems 24
Poor signage 6
Safety problems 2
Misc. 2

 
Only 23 subjects answered the question, with seven subjects indicating that they had no problems with making transfers that affected their employment opportunities.  This question asked subjects to think about “transferring between different transit modes.” This question appeared to cause subjects to think beyond their previous answers that mostly criticized the transit system itself and to start to deal with problems caused by their lack of vision.

By far the most common problem indicated was “problems with identity or spatial information.”  Subjects made 56 comments that fit this category.   They included general statements about lack of information and making connections to more specific comments about the difficulties in finding, buses, bus stops, fare machines, gates, and other amenities.   They also mentioned how they “did not know” where many of the transit locations were.  They also mentioned how hard it was to get help about the system.   These subjects’ responses confirm the basic premise that the blind and vision-impaired lack access to information, especially spatial information that restricts their use of transit and, therefore, restricts their ability to travel independently and to take advantage of urban opportunities.

Problems with the transit system were mentioned 24 times.   These comments included concerns about long wait times, limited hours and service areas, and other time constraints.   They also mentioned stations not being accessible or standardized.

Poor signage was mentioned six times.   These comments could have been included in either of the first two categories, but it is treated separately here, because signage for the blind has been largely ignored. These responses were from those who had some limited vision.   After they had used RIAS (see sections 3.4.2 , 3.4.3 , 3.4.4 ), the problem of signage became apparent even to those with no vision.

Comments about safety issues were made two times: one subject mentioned unsafe street crossings and another mentioned that bus transfer points were unsafe.  There were two comments that were not categorized.   One mentioned that mistakes can be made, and another mentioned how advance trips had to be made in order to understand the system before it can be effectively used.  These could have fit into several of the categories like poor signage or problems with spatial information.

The results of these two questions shed some light on problems facing the vision-impaired traveler.   Subjects mentioned many of the same problems of transit that are inherent in any fixed-route transit system, such as inadequate or restricted service areas, long waits between vehicles, long walks or expensive rides to a transit stop, inadequate signage, and the confusion of multiple systems.   In addition, they mentioned specific problems relating to their lack of vision, such as having trouble finding locations and the difficulty of finding information and assistance.   These vision-related difficulties and their possible mitigation by the use of RIAS are examined in depth in the next section.  

 
BACK TO OVERVIEW
BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS
NEXT SECTION